Day 34: Grooveshark Still Going Strong…

sharks
April 30th: Grooveshark.com is shut down.
May 5th: Grooveshark.io surfaces in its place.
May 7th: Grooveshark.io becomes a globally-ranked website.
May 14th: Grooveshark.io is shut down.
May 15th: Grooveshark.vc surfaces in its place.
May 16th: Grooveshark.vc shut down.
May 19th: Grooveshark.im surfaces in its place.
May 20th: Grooveshark.im remains, Grooveshark.li also surfaces.
May 21st: Grooveshark.li becomes a globally-ranked site.
May 28th: Ex-Grooveshark employee pens letter to the industry, promises that 'Grooveshark will never die'.
June 1st: Grooveshark.li becomes one of the top-ranked sites in Sweden.
June 3rd: Grooveshark.li still standing...

Image by Ryan Espanto, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC by 2.0).

The post Day 34: Grooveshark Still Going Strong… appeared first on Digital Music News.


Source: Industry News

SoundHound Is Trying to Compete with Siri, Cortana, and Google Now…

Hound_Android

SoundHound isn’t going to idly sit around as Shazam adds features like TV and visual recognition. Hell, SoundHound is no longer content with having Shazam as their only real main competitor.

The music recognition app is no longer just a music recognition app…<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
*   ‘http://72.52.81.231/revive/www/delivery/…’
* to
*   ‘https://72.52.81.231/revive/www/delivery/…’
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

// <![CDATA[
var m3_u = (location.protocol==’https:’?’https://72.52.81.231/revive/www/delivery/r9.php’:’http://72.52.81.231/revive/www/delivery/r9.php’);
   var m3_r = Math.floor(Math.random()*99999999999);
   if (!document.MAX_used) document.MAX_used = ‘,’;
   document.write (“”);
// ]]>They’ve launched Hound, a competitor to Siri, Cortana, and Google Now. SoundHound says that the app is able to not only understand words, but can also understand language. They say you can speak to the app naturally, and can even ask it complex questions.

Hound is launching in beta on Android, and will be available on iOS in a few months.

Yes, you can use Hound to identify songs… but you can also use it to book hotels, get directions, and play voice enabled games.

 

Nina Ulloa covers breaking news, tech, and more: @nine_u

The post SoundHound Is Trying to Compete with Siri, Cortana, and Google Now… appeared first on Digital Music News.


Source: Industry News

Grooveshark.li Is Now One of the Largest Sites In Sweden…

groovesharklisweden

Sweden is famous for being the birthplace of Spotify.  But now, it’s becoming the re-birthplace for Grooveshark:

According to Alexa stats updated this morning, Grooveshark.li is now ranked 8,671 in Sweden, part of a rapid and continued global rise.

Grooveshark.li is also surging in other countries like Spain, where the ranking is 17,742.  Other countries are also welcoming the new Grooveshark clone, including Colombia (12,046) and Israel (16,664).

Meanwhile, the clock is ticking on a music industry that has spent tens of millions burying Grooveshark in court but somehow can’t make it go away.  In primetime mega-markets like the US, for example, Grooveshark.li is about to break the all-important 100,000-mark, a threshold already crossed in Euro-heavyweights like France, Germany, and the UK.

groovesharklisweden2

The tenaciously resilient grooveshark.li is believed to be the work of  a shadowy Grooveshark ex-employee, one determined to frustrate the major label cabal.  “So because we don’t have goldman [Sachs] paying $20 million to line the pockets [the major labels] just dug up some dirty emails and shut it down after running us dry,” the disgruntled ex wrote in a recent DMN op-ed.   “So you happy now music industry?  You just fucked yourselves over and made a problem that will be 10 times as bad that you can NEVER control.  And artists LOSE again.”

“and just so I can be 100% clear: GROOVESHARK WILL NEVER DIE!  I’m gonna make sure of that.”

 

 

 

The post Grooveshark.li Is Now One of the Largest Sites In Sweden… appeared first on Digital Music News.


Source: Industry News

Sources: Sony Could Face Class-Action Litigation Over Spotify Advances…

justicebalance

The following is a developing story.  Please check back for ongoing updates today and throughout the weekend.

Sony Music Entertainment, as well as Warner Music Group and Universal Music Group, could face a very serious, class-action lawsuit involving non-payment of streaming advances, according to multiple sources briefing Digital Music News.

Specifically, the action would seek to get artists paid fairly for massive, upfront cash transfers from streaming services like Spotify, which many artists and managers say are not being shared with a large majority of signed artists.

The class-action would come in the wake of a very embarrassing leak of Sony Music Entertainment’s 2011 contract with Spotify, one that featured large cash advances and control over portions of Spotify’s advertising inventory (that contract can be found here).

That contract also included ‘Most Favored Nations’ guarantees, which strongly suggests that the other two major labels are enjoying similar terms.

“This goes beyond Sony, and [the other majors] can be touched,” one source relayed.

The sources were careful to stress that the potential action has not been filed, and currently faces significant hurdles related to artist participation and the language of specific artist contracts.  Importantly, that includes specific language in many artist contracts that could offer major labels absolute impunity to claim 100% of advance payments from Spotify — regardless of the ethical issues involved.

That appears to be the case with an older contract between Lady Gaga and Universal Music Group, which contains specific language allowing UMG not to pay Gaga anything on special advances, cash-outs, or anything else that doesn’t involve the direct, specific use of Gaga’s tracks.

The Gaga contract was first leaked to Digital Music News, and is available here.

But even if that problems persists, sources noted that a group of artist representatives and attorneys may still be motivated to bring the action, merely to highlight just how badly these contracts are screwing their clients.

“That may be the only way we can get this to change,” one source relayed.

Elsewhere, both the European Commission and US Copyright Office are taking a look at the Sony/Spotify contract, thanks to urgings by organizations like the International Music Managers Forum (IMMF) and the International Artist Organisation (IAO).   At this point, it’s unclear what action these influential organizations will take, though this will certainly sway future decision-making.

sonycontract

Meanwhile, both Sony Music Group and Warner Music Group have been frantically taking steps to assure artists and managers that they are indeed paying artists on streaming advances.  But the statements all revolve around ‘breakage,’ an antiquated concept that protected labels from making payments on things like cracked wax cylinders and broken vinyl that couldn’t be sold.  “Under the Sony Music ‘Breakage Policy,’ SME shares with its recording artists all unallocated income from advances, non-recoupable payments and minimum revenue guarantees that Sony Music receives under its digital distribution deals,” Sony offered in its only post-leak statement this week.

Warner Music Group has now chimed in with a similar message, despite almost laughable skepticism.  “Warner Music shares all advances, minimum guarantees and ‘flat fees’ with its artists,”Warner Music Group offered in a statement.

“This policy has been in effect at Warner Music since 2009, purposely treating breakage like other digital revenue.”

 

Warner Music Group, like Sony, is no stranger to massive class actions.  Just recently, WMG settled a large class-action lawsuit by more than 3,000 interns, who accused Warner Music of deliberately exploiting them and violating local labor laws by paying little or nothing for their work.  Elsewhere, Warner also agreed to pay $11.5 million to settle class accusations of underpayment on digital downloads, part of a broader group of settlements related to digital royalties to artists.

More as this situation develops.

The post Sources: Sony Could Face Class-Action Litigation Over Spotify Advances… appeared first on Digital Music News.


Source: Industry News